|
Your need to know is our
business |
|
|
|
|
|
1120 S. San
Gabriel Blvd |
Successful
Cases:1. Iron Export Fraud to Japan
Case: In
1989, Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of investigating an iron export fraud
from a Chinese province international trading group corporation to Japan.
Through a few months worth of research, trips to several provinces,
examining the location of the fraud, interviewing many witnesses,
collecting some important and detailed evidences; finally reclaimed
several millions dollars for the client through the courts. 2. Business Background Check
Before Island Development Investments Case: In
1988, Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of a business background check on an
island development investment case. The investor is an international
financial investment enterprise in Hong Kong. Through careful studying of
the draft agreement, a trip to the actual location of the investment, and
collection of many first hand evidence, Mr. Tang found out that opposite
side did not have the legal documents to allow them to the develop the
island. Therefore preventing losses from a careless blind investment. 3. Refusal to Pay Because of
Leather Down's Quality Case: In
1989, Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of investigating the case of refusal
to pay because of leather down's quality. The client was an China
Mainland leather down Export Company and the buyer was a company in Hong
Kong who refused to pay because it claimed that the quality was unfit to
the contract. Through investigating, The quality of Leather Down was fully
fit the contract after re-examined the sample of leather down from the
exported by Bureau of Import & Export Merchandise Examination
authorized by government. Collecting the exact 4. International Trade L/C
Fraud Case: In
1993, Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of
investigating the International Trade L/C Fraud Case. The client
was an China Mainland silk garment Export
Company and the buyer was a company in New York who refused to pay at
sight by Letter of Credit through the bank, because it claimed that the
terms of payment was unfit to the contract. Through investigation,
interview the witnesses of accounting depart of bank, staff of
international shipping company, collecting many evidence that the buyer
illegal changed the terms of payment of L/C, then got the contract
merchandise from the transporting port using the copy of shipping 5.International Trade Payment
seized Case: 1995,
Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of investigating a US Import Company's
international Trade payment was seized in China claimed by a China
Mainland company case. Through the investigations in China and US, The US
company refused to receive the merchandise because of the exported
merchandise quality problems. On the other hand, China Mainland Company
went to court claiming the seize order, The US Company's international
Trade payment in China was seized. Through further investigation,
interview the witnesses of case, colleting detail evidence, We found out
that the legal opinion and evidence of claiming seize order was
insufficient to Chinese law, we requested the appeared court to released
the seize order and it had been proved . 6. International Trade Fraud Case 1996,
Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of investigating a world trade fraud case
that a Taiwan company exporting real leather garments to B company in Los
Angeles, the B company did not pay and disappeared after receiving the
goods. Through further investigation, interview the witnesses, colleting
detail evidence with high 7.
International missing people case: 1996,
Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of investigating a international missing
people case. A university professor from China mainland lost his family
members when he visiting US. Through further investigation, interview the witnesses,
colleting detail evidence with high detective technical and equipments,
the Professor's family members were found soon. 8. The last
minuets of The Death judgment Case: 1983, Mr. Bright Tang was in charge of investigating a Death judgment case. Mr. Bright Tang found out that the position of blood drop did not mach between the description of the case files and criminal scene. This influenced the judgment of the case seriously. Through study the case deeply, interviewing the witnesses, Investigating the criminal scene. A motion of the blood type test with suspect and victim had been put forward by Mr. Bright Tang. The test results showed off that The blood type of the suspect was as same as the victim’s. It means that the position of blood drop did not mach between the description of the case files and criminal scene was a existed fact, there were no other evidence explaining it, and further more, the prosecutor could not make sure the details of this homicide case. for example, Who attacked other one first, suspect or victim? Who could take full responsibility, or partly, in Crime Law. It would have been unclear facts in this homicide case if The Death judgment had been given to the suspect. The appear Court accepted Mr. Bright Tang's motion, The Death Judgment had been changed finally.
|